The SOLID principles of software architecture consist of a collection of guidelines that can help programmers build better software. These principles help developers build loosely coupled, cohesive systems that have high cohesion and low coupling.
In his book entitled Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices, Robert C. Martin introduced these principles. This programming tutorial talks about the SOLID principles of software architecture, and their benefits.
What are SOLID Principles of Software Architecture?
- Single Responsibility Principle
- Open/Closed Principle
- Liskov Substitution Principle
- Interface Segregation Principle
- Dependency Inversion Principle
These principles can help you build resilient, maintainable, and extendable applications. Some of the benefits of adhering to the solid principles of software architecture include:
- More robust systems: By following solid principles, developers can create systems that are more resistant to change and less likely to break when modifications are made.
- Better Reusability: By adhering to these principles, you can build reusable components.
- Easier maintenance: Solid principle-based systems are typically easier to maintain and understand, making them less time-consuming and expensive to keep up-to-date.
- Better scalability: Another advantage of using solid principles is that systems designed this way are often more scalable, meaning they can be extended over time if needed.
The Single Responsibility Principle
Per the Single Responsibility Principle, every class should not have more than one responsibility, (i.e., it should have one and only one purpose). If you have multiple responsibilities, the functionality of the class should be split into multiple classes, with each of them handling a specific responsibility.
Types with many responsibilities tend to be coupled with one another. This coupling can lead to fragile designs and such classes become difficult to manage and maintain over time.
If you adhere to this principle, here are the benefits of the Single Responsibility Principle:
- Simplicity: The code is easier to understand since the functionality is not spread across multiple classes. This will help you keep your simple, manageable and clean.
- Maintainability: This reduces the complexity and increases the maintainability of your code since each class has a single responsibility only.
- Reusability: Since there are no dependencies between different parts of the system, you can reuse components across the application without worrying about breaking anything else.
The Open Closed Principle
According to the Open Closed Principle, classes should be open for extension, (i.e., they can be extended but closed for modification and they should not be modifiable). When classes are open for extension but closed for modification, developers can extend the functionality of a class without having to modify the existing code in that class. In other words, programmers should make sure their code can handle new requirements without compromising on the existing functionality.
Bertrand Meyer is credited with introducing this principle in his book entitled “Object-Oriented Software Construction.” According to Meyer, “a software entity should be open for extension but closed for modification.”
The idea behind this principle is that it allows developers to extend software functionality while preserving the existing functionality. In practical terms, this means that new functionality should be added by extending the code of an existing class rather than by modifying the code of that class.
When code is extended rather than modified, there is less risk of introducing bugs. It can also make it easier to understand code since the structure of classes is not changed when new functionality is added.
Extending classes is not always possible or desirable, however. In some cases, creating a new class with the required functionality may be better, rather than extending an existing class.
Here are the benefits of the Open Closed Principle at a glance:
- You can add new features without changing existing code
- Your application will be more flexible because it can evolve over time
- It reduces the time and effort required to add new features to an application
- It increases the maintainability of the source code
Liskov Substitution Principle
The Liskov Substitution Principle, or LSP, is a design principle that states that replaceable and interchangeable types should behave similarly. The principle, which Barbara Liskov introduced in her 1988 paper, “Data Abstraction and Hierarchy,” states that, if you have a type T and a subtype S of T, then objects of type S should be substitutable for objects of type T.
It follows that if B is a subtype of A, then objects of type B can be used as substitutes for objects of type A. In other words, if you have a class A and a class B, with B being a subclass of A, then you can replace any instance of B with an instance of A.
It states that a child class should be able to be used in place of a parent class without any errors. This principle is essential for ensuring that software components are interchangeable and can be easily replaced without affecting the rest of the code.
The Interface Segregation Principle
The Interface Segregation Principle is a design principle that says you should “write client-specific interfaces, and make sure clients don’t depend on methods of other interfaces.” This means that, if you want to use an alternative implementation, you can do so without having to change any client code.
In other words, an interface should be designed so that clients only have to know about the methods they need to use. This principle is fundamental in object-oriented programming (OOP), where interfaces are used to define the contracts between objects.
Adhering to the Interface Segregation Principle can make a developer’s code more flexible and maintainable. This helps to prevent tight coupling between objects, which makes them easier to reuse and maintain.
Here are the benefits of the Interface Segregation Principle at a glance:
- Reduces coupling between components because they don’t share the same interface
- Encourages loose coupling between components, which makes them easier to change, maintain and testable
- Allows components to be replaced with alternative implementations
Dependency Inversion Principle
Per the Dependency Inversion Principle, high-level modules in an application should not rely on their low-level modules. Instead, both should rely on abstractions. While details should depend on abstractions, the reverse is not implied. The Dependency Inversion Principle recommends abstractions over concretions.
Here are several benefits to the Dependency Inversion Principle:
- It makes code more flexible, reusable, modular, and easier to change
- It makes code more testable since high-level modules can be mocked or stubbed out when testing low-level modules
- It can make code more flexible since new low-level modules can be easily plugged in without having to make changes to high-level modules.
One way to achieve dependency inversion is through the use of abstractions. Abstractions can be created using interfaces or abstract base classes. By depending on abstraction instead of a concrete implementation, high-level modules can be easily changed to use different implementations without making any changes.
Developers can also achieve dependency inversion by leveraging inversion of control containers. These containers manage the creation and lifetime of objects and provide a mechanism for resolving dependencies. Using an inversion of control container allows high-level modules to be easily tested without worrying about dependencies. However, dependency inversion is not always easy to implement.
Final Thoughts on SOLID Principles for Developers
The SOLID principles of software architecture are guidelines that can help you write code that is reusable, follows the principles of object orientation, promotes loose coupling and high cohesion. These principles comprise a collection of best practices that you can follow to design and implement high quality software systems.