Java Programming, Notes # 1478
Programming in Java doesn’t have to be dull and boring. In fact,
it’s possible to have a lot of fun while programming in Java. This
lesson is one in a series that concentrates on having fun while programming
You may find it useful to open another copy of this lesson in a separate
browser window. That will make it easier for you to scroll back and
forth among the different figures and listings while you are reading about
I recommend that you also study the other lessons in my extensive collection
of online Java tutorials. You will find those lessons published at
as of the date of this writing, Gamelan doesn’t maintain a consolidated index
of my Java tutorial lessons, and sometimes they are difficult to locate there.
You will find a consolidated index at www.DickBaldwin.com.
In addition, you will find some background material on DSP that is important
to this lesson at
This lesson deals
with a topic commonly know as Digital Signal Processing, (DSP for short).
Computational requirements for DSP
The computational requirements for implementing
DSP in a computer program are usually straightforward. Almost all DSP
operations consist of multiplying corresponding values contained in two numeric
series and then calculating the sum of the products. Sometimes, the final
sum is divided by the total number of values included in the sum. This is often referred
to as a sum-of-products or multiply-add operation.
(This is the digital equivalent of integrating the product of two
continuous functions between two limits.)
Such an operation can be indicated by the symbolic
notation shown in Figure 1 (where the strange looking thing constructed
of straight lines is the Greek letter sigma).
z =(1/N) * / x(n) * y(n)
n = 0
Figure 1 A typical sum-of-products operation
A sum-of-products operation
This notation means that a new value for z
is calculated by multiplying the first N corresponding samples from
each of two numeric series (x(n) and y(n)), calculating
the sum of the products, and dividing the sum by N.
(In this lesson, I will be dealing primarily with numeric series that
represent samples from a continuous function taken over time.
Therefore, I will often refer to the numeric series as a time series.)
An alternative notation
The above notation requires about six lines of text to
and therefore could easily become scrambled during the HTML publishing process.
I have invented an alternative notation that means exactly the same thing,
but is less likely to be damaged during the HTML publishing process.
My new notation is shown in Figure 2. You should be able to compare
this notation with Figure 1 and correlate the terms in the notation to the
verbal description of the operation given above.
|z = (1/N)
* S(n=0,N-1)[(x(n) * y(n)]
Figure 2 Alternate notation for a sum-of-products
This is the notation that I will use in this lesson
What is a time series?
of this lesson, suffice it to say that a time series is a set of sample values
taken from a continuous function at equal increments of time over a specified time interval. For
example, if you were to record the temperature in your office every minute for
six hours, the set of 360 different values that you would record could be considered
as a time series.
A new time series is produced
In DSP, we often multiply two time series together on a sample by sample
basis. When I multiply the values in the time
series x(n) by the corresponding values in the time series y(n),
that produces a new time series, which I will call w(n).
Calculation of the mean or average
If I compute the sum of the individual values in
the series w(n), and then divide that sum by the number of samples,
this is nothing more than the calculation of the mean or average value of
the time series named w(n). Most DSP operations boil down to
nothing more complicated than calculating the average value of the product
of two time series.
Knowing what to multiply, when, and why
The real trick in DSP is knowing what
to multiply, when to multiply it, and why to multiply it.
algorithms are very complex. For example, the Fast Fourier Transform
algorithm, (FFT), involves nothing more than a lot of multiply-add
operations under the control of an extremely complex algorithm.
In this lesson, I will concentrate on the Discrete Fourier Transform
algorithm, (DFT), which is much less complex and therefore much
easier to understand.
(While the DFT and the FFT produce the same
results, the DFT typically runs much more slowly than the FFT, which is
optimized for speed.)
Multiply-add speed is important
Some DSP processes require extremely large numbers
of multiply-add operations. In order to perform DSP in real time, the
equipment used to perform the arithmetic must be extremely fast. That
is where the special DSP chips, (which are designed to perform multiply-add
operations at an extremely high rate of speed) earn their keep.
The net area under the curve
If you plot a time series as a curve on a graph,
as shown in Figure 3, the sum of the values that make up the time series is
an estimate of the net area under the curve.
(Assuming that the horizontal axis represents
a value of zero, the sample values above the axis contribute a positive value
to the net area and the sample values below the curve contribute a negative
value to the net area. In the case of Figure 3, I attempted to come
up with a set of sample values that would produce a net area of zero. In
other words, the area above the horizontal axis was intended to perfectly
balance the area below the horizontal axis.)
Figure 3 Plot of values in a time series
A periodic example
A periodic time series is one in which a set of sample
values repeats over time, provided that you record enough samples to include one
or more periods. Figure
4 shows a plot of a periodic time series. You can see that the same
set of values repeats as you move from left to right on the curve plotted
in Figure 4.
Figure 4 Area under a periodic curve
Periodic curves can often be viewed as the sum of
two curves. One of the curves is the periodic component having a zero
net area under the curve when measured across an even number of cycles.
The other component is a constant bias offset that is added to every value
of the periodic curve.
Each of the solid dark blobs in Figure 4 is a sample
value. The horizontal line represents a sample value of zero.
(The empty circle is the sample value half way through the sampling interval.
The only reason it is different is to mark the mid point.)
The net area under the curve
What is the net area under the curve in Figure 4?
Can you examine the curve and come up with a good estimate. As it turns
out, the net area under the curve in Figure 4 is very close to zero (at
least it is as close to zero as I was able to draw it).
Now take a look at Figure 5. What is the net
area under the curve in Figure 5?
Figure 5 Area under a periodic curve with
Compare Figure 5 to Figure 4
Compare Figure 5 with Figure 4. Each of these
curves describes the same periodic shape (although Figure 4 has a larger
peak-to-peak amplitude, meaning simply that every value in Figure 4 has been
multiplied by the same scale factor).
However, the curve in Figure 5 is riding
up on a positive bias, while the curve in Figure 4 is centered about the horizontal
axis. While the net area under the curve in Figure 4 is zero, the net
area under the curve in Figure 5 is a non-zero positive value.
The curve in Figure 5 can be considered to consist
of the sum of two parts. One part is a straight horizontal line on
the positive side of the horizontal axis. The other part is the periodic
curve from Figure 4, added to that positive bias.
(The curve in Figure 4 can also be considered
to consist of the sum of two parts. However, in Figure 4, the bias value
The net area
The net area contributed by the periodic part of
the curve in Figure 5 continues to be zero. In effect, the non-zero
net area under the curve in Figure 5 is the amount of the positive bias multiplied
by the number of points. In other words, because I captured an even
number of cycles of the periodic portion of the curve in my calculation of
net area, only the bias contributes a non-zero value to the net area under
the total curve.
Part of a cycle
Had I failed to capture an even number of cycles
of the periodic portion of the curve, then the positive lobes might not
completely cancel the negative lobes, and the net area under the curve would
be influenced by the periodic portion of the curve in addition to the bias.
Why is this important?
These concepts are extremely important in this lesson
as we learn how to do frequency spectral analysis.
As you will see in this lesson, in doing frequency
spectral analysis, we will form a product between a target time series
and a sinusoid. The purpose is to measure the power contained in
the time series at the frequency of the sinusoid.
The product of the target time series and the sinusoid
will produce the sum of a potentially infinite number of periodic functions, some of
which may be riding on a positive or negative bias. We will measure
the amount of bias by computing the average value of the product time series.
The amount of bias will be our estimate of the power contained in the target
time series at the frequency of the sinusoid.
The Fourier Transform
There is a mathematical process, known as the Fourier transform, which
can be used to linearly transform information back and forth between two
different domains. The information can be represented by sets of complex
numbers in either or both domains.
The domains can represent a variety of
different things. In DSP, the domains are often referred to as the time
domain and the frequency domain, but that is not a requirement.
For example, one of the domains could represent the samples that make up the
pixels in a photograph and the other domain could represent something having to
do with the manipulation of photographs.
Usually when dealing with the time domain and the frequency domain, the
values that make up the samples in the time domain are purely real while the
values that make up the samples in the frequency domain are complex.
Time domain and frequency domain
For some purposes, it is preferable to have your information in the time
domain. For other purposes, it is preferable to have your information
in the frequency domain. The Fourier transform allows you to transform
your information back and forth between these two domains at will.
For example, it is possible to transform information from the time domain
into the frequency domain, modify that information in the frequency domain,
and then transform the modified information back into the time domain.
This is one way to accomplish frequency filtering.
Example of time domain and frequency domain
If you were to draw a graph of the voltage impinging on the speaker coils
on your stereo system over time, that would be a time series, which is a
member of the time domain.
If you were to observe the lights dancing up and down on the front of
your equalizer while the music is playing, you would be observing the same
information presented in the frequency domain. Typically the lights on the
left represent low frequencies or bass while the lights on the right side
represent high frequencies or treble. Often there is a slider associated
with each vertical group of lights that allows you to apply filters to emphasize
certain parts of the frequency spectrum and to de-emphasize other parts of the
Forward and inverse transforms
Two very similar forms of the Fourier transform exist. The forward
transform is used to transform information from the time domain into the
frequency domain. The inverse transform is used to transform information
from the frequency domain back to the time domain.
Sampled time series
The theoretical Fourier transform is defined using integral calculus as
applied to continuous functions. As a practical matter, in the digital
world, we almost never deal with continuous functions. Rather, we deal
with functions that have been reduced to a series of discrete numbers (or
samples), which are the result of some discrete measurement system.
(As mentioned earlier, recording the temperature in your office once each minute for twenty-four
hours would produce such a discrete series of numbers.)
Integration and summation
In many cases, the integration operation encountered in integral calculus
can be approximated in the digital world by a summation operation using
discrete data. That is the case with the Fourier transform. Thus,
the summation form of the Fourier transform that is applied to discrete time
series is known as the Discrete Fourier Transform, or DFT.
The DFT is a computationally intense operation. Given certain
restrictions involving the number of values in the time series and the number
of frequencies at which the spectral analysis will be performed, there is a
special algorithm that can result
in computational economy. The algorithm that is used to realize that
economy is commonly referred to as the Fast Fourier Transform, or
DFT versus FFT
The DFT is more general than the FFT, but the FFT is much faster than the DFT.
It is important to understand that these are simply two different algorithms
for doing the same thing. Either can be used to produce the
same results (but as mentioned earlier, the FFT is somewhat more restricted
as to the number of time-domain and frequency-domain samples).
Because the DFT algorithm is somewhat easier to understand than the FFT
algorithm, I will concentrate on the DFT algorithm to explain how and why the Fourier
transform accomplishes what it accomplishes.
Using my alternative notation described earlier, the expressions that you
must evaluate to determine the frequency spectral content of a target time
series at a frequency F are shown in Figure 6 (note that I didn’t bother
to divide by N).
|Real(F) = S(n=0,N-1)[x(n)*cos(2Pi*F*n)]
Imag(F) = S(n=0,N-1)[x(n)*sin(2Pi*F*n)]
= Real(F) - j*Imag(F)
Real(F)*Real(F) + Imag(F)*Imag(F)
Figure 6 Forward Fourier transform
What does this really mean?
Before you panic, let me explain what this means in layman’s terms.
Given a time series, x(n), you can determine if that time series
contains a cosine component or a sine component at a given frequency, F,
by doing the following:
- Create one new time series, cos(n), which is a cosine function
with the frequency F.
- Create another new time series, sin(n), which is a sine
function with the frequency F. (The methods needed to create
the cosine and sine time series are available in the Math class in the
standard Java library.)
- Multiply x(n) by cos(n) and compute the sum of the
products. Save this value, calling it Real(F). This
is an estimate of the amplitude, if any, of the cosine component with the
matching frequency contained in the time series x(n).
- Multiply x(n) by sin(n) and compute the sum of the
products. Save this value, calling it Imag(F). This
is an estimate of the amplitude, if any, of the sine component with the matching
frequency contained in the time series x(n).
- Consider the values for Real(F) and Imag(F) to be the
real and imaginary parts of a complex number.
- Consider the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary parts to
represent the power at that frequency in the time series.
It’s that simple
That’s all there is to it. For each frequency of interest, you
can use this process to compute a complex number, Real(F) – jImag(F),
which represents the component of that frequency in the target time series.
(The mathematicians in the audience probably prefer to use the symbol
i instead of the symbol j to represent the imaginary part.
The use of j for this purpose comes from my electrical engineering
Similarly, you can compute the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary
parts and consider that to be a measure of the power at that frequency in the
(This is the value that you would likely see being
displayed by one of the dancing vertical bars on the front of the equalizer on your
Normally we are interested in more than one frequency, so we would repeat
the above procedure once for each frequency of interest.
(This would produce the set of values that you would likely see being
displayed by all of the dancing vertical bars on the font of the equalizer
on your stereo system.)
Why does this work?
This works because of the three trigonometric identities shown in Figure
Although these identities apply to the products of sine and cosine values
for single angles a and b, it is a simple matter to extend
them to represent the products of time series consisting of sine and cosine
functions. Such an extension is shown in Figure 8.
Products of sine and cosine functions
In each of the three cases shown in Figure 8, the function f(n)
is a time series produced by multiplying two other time series, which are either
sine functions or cosine functions.
1. f(n) = sin(a*n)*sin(b*n)
2. f(n) = cos(a*n)*cos(b*n)
3. f(n) = sin(a*n)*cos(b*n)
Rewrite and simplify
Figure 9 rewrites and simplifies these three functions for the special
case where a=b, taking into account the fact that cos(0) =1
and sin(0) = 0.
| 1. f(n) = sin(a*n)*sin(a*n)
2. f(n) = cos(a*n)*cos(a*n) = (1/2)+cos(2*a*n)/2
3. f(n) = sin(a*n)*cos(a*n) = sin(2*a*n)/2
What can we deduce from these identities?
First you need to recall that the average of the values describing any true
sinusoid is zero when the average is computed over an even number of cycles of
(A true sinusoid does not have a bias to
prevent it from being centered on the horizontal axis.)
If a time series consists of the sum of two true sinusoids, then the average
of the values describing that time series will be zero if the average is
computed over an even number of cycles of both sinusoids, and very close to zero
if the average is computed over a period that is not an even number of cycles
for either or both sinusoids.
(The average will approach zero as
the length of data over which the average is computed increases.)
Product of two sine functions having the same
Let’s apply this knowledge to the three cases shown above for a=b.
Consider the time series for case 1 in Figure 9. This case is the
product of two sine functions having the same frequency. The result
of multiplying the two sine functions is shown graphically in Figure 10.
Figure 10 Plot of sin(x) and sin(x)*sin(x)
The red curve in Figure 10 shows the function sin(x), and the black
curve shows the function produced by multiplying sin(x) by sin(x).
The sum of the product function is not zero
If you sum the values of the black curve over an even number of cycles,
the sum will not be zero. Rather, it will be a positive, non-zero value.
Now refer back to Imag(F) in Figure 6. The imaginary part
is computed by multiplying the time series by a sine function and computing
the sum of the products. If that time series contains a sine component
with the same frequency as the sine function, that component will contribute
a non-zero value to the sum of products. Thus, the imaginary part
of the transform at that frequency will not be zero.
Product of two cosine functions having the same
Now consider the time series for case 2 in Figure 9. This case is
the product of two cosine functions having the same frequency. The
result of multiplying two cosine functions having the same frequency is shown
graphically in Figure 11.
Figure 11 Plot of cos(x) and cos(x)*cos(x)
The red curve in Figure 11 shows the function cos(x), and the black
curve shows the function produced by multiplying cos(x) by cos(x).
Again the sum of products is not zero
If you sum the values of the black curve in Figure 11 over an even number
of cycles, the sum will not be zero. Rather, it will be a positive,
Now refer back to the expression for Real(F) in Figure 6. The
real part of the transform is computed by multiplying the time series by
a cosine function having a particular frequency and computing the sum of
products. If that time series contains a cosine component with the
same frequency as the cosine function, that component will contribute a non-zero
value to the sum of products. Thus, the real part of the transform
at that frequency will not be zero.
Product of a sine function and a cosine function
Now consider the time series for case 3 in Figure 9, which is the product
of a sine function and a cosine function having the same frequency.
The result of computing this product is shown graphically in Figure 12
Figure 12 Plot of sin(x), cos(x), and sin(x)*cos(x)
The red curve in Figure 12 shows the function cos(x), and the green
curve shows the function sin(x). The black curve shows the function
produced by multiplying sin(x) by cos(x).
The sum of the products will be zero
If you sum the values of the black curve over an even number of cycles,
the sum will be zero.
Therefore, referring back to Figure 6, we see that the Real(F)
computation measures only the cosine component in the time series at a particular
frequency, and the Imag(F) computation measures only the sine component
in the time series having the same frequency.
The Real(F) computation in Figure 6 does not produce a non-zero
output due to a sine component in the time series having the same frequency.
The Imag(F) computation in Figure 6 does not produce a non-zero output
due to a cosine component in the time series having the same frequency.
Thus, at a particular frequency, the existence of a cosine component in
the target time series produces the real output, and the existence
of a sine component in the target time series produces the imaginary
Neither sine nor cosine
In reality, the sinusoidal components that make up a time series will not usually
be sine functions or cosine functions. Rather, they will be
sinusoidal components having the same shape as a sine or cosine, but not having
the same value at zero as either a sine function or a cosine function.
However, it can be shown that a general sinusoidal function can always be
represented by the sum of a sine function and a cosine function having different
(A proof of the above statement is beyond the scope of this lesson.
You will simply have to accept on faith that a general time series can be
represented as the sum of a potentially infinite number of sine functions
and cosine functions of different frequencies and different amplitudes.
It is these cosine and sine functions that constitute the real and imaginary
components of the complex frequency spectrum.)
What about non-matching frequency components?
Now we know what happens when the frequency of the sin and cos terms in
Figure 6 match the frequency of sine and cosine components in the target
time series. Another important question is, what do sine and cosine
components in the target time series with frequencies different from the
cos and sin terms in Figure 6 contribute to the output?
The answer is not very much. Referring once more to the functional
forms produced by multiplying sine and cosine functions (repeated in
Figure 13 for convenience), we see that for any values of a
and b, where a is not equal to b, the function produced
by multiplying two sinusoids will be the sum of two other sinusoids.
The sum of the values for any sinusoid computed over an even number of
cycles of the sinusoid will always be zero, and these sinusoids are no
exception to that rule.
1. f(n) = sin(a*n)*sin(b*n)
2. f(n) = cos(a*n)*cos(b*n)
3. f(n) = sin(a*n)*cos(b*n)
Sum and difference frequencies
For any pair of arbitrary values for a and b, the frequencies
of the sinusoids in the resulting functions will be given by a+b and
(These are often referred to as the sum and difference frequencies.
Note that as a approaches b, the difference frequency
approaches zero. This is what produces the constant values of 1/2 in
Figure 9 and the positive bias on the black curve in Figures 10 and 11.)
A form of measurement error
As a practical matter, if those resulting sum and difference frequencies
are not multiples of one another, it will not be possible to perform the
summation over an even number of cycles of both sinusoids. Therefore,
one or the other, or perhaps both, will contribute a small amount to the
sum of products due to including a partial cycle in the summation. This
is a form of measurement error that occurs when performing frequency spectrum
analysis using Fourier transform methods.
(The percentage contribution of this error to the average value
decreases as the number of cycles included in the average increases.)
Product of two sine functions at different frequencies
Consider the product of two sine functions at different frequencies as
shown in Figure 14. This is a plot of the function produced by multiplying
sin(1.8x) by sin(2.2x).
Figure 14 Plot of sin(1.8x)*sin(2.2x)
The high frequency component shown in Figure 14 is the component attributable
to a+b. The long sweeping low frequency component is the component
attributable to a-b.
The sum of the product function
Judging from the graph in Figure 14, performing a summation of the product
function from -7 to +7 would include almost exactly nine cycles of the high
frequency component. Thus, the high frequency component would contribute
very little, if anything, to the summation.
However, the summation would include less than one complete cycle of the
low frequency component. Therefore, the low frequency component would
contribute some output to the summation in the form of a measurement error.
Similar results occur when multiplying a cosine function by a cosine function
having a different frequency,
or when multiplying a cosine function by a sine function having a different
results for these two cases are shown in Figures 15 and 16.
Figure 15 Plot of cos(1.8x)*cos(2.2x)
Figure 16 Plot of sin(1.8x)*cos(2.2x)
Once again, unless the summation interval includes an exact number of
samples of both the sum frequency and the difference frequency, one of both
of the sinusoids contained in the product function would contribute a measurement
error to the result.
In this lesson, I have provided a quasi-theoretical basis for frequency
A pure theoretical basis for frequency spectrum analysis involves some rather
complicated mathematics and is somewhat difficult to understand. However,
from a practical viewpoint, it is not too difficult to understand how the
complex mathematics produce the results that they produce.
Hopefully the quasi-theoretical explanations provided in this lesson will
help you to understand what makes spectrum analysis work.
The next lesson in this series will reduce much of what I have discussed in
this lesson to practice. I will present and explain a program that
implements a DFT algorithm for performing frequency spectrum analysis. In
addition, I will present the results of several interesting experiments in
frequency spectrum analysis using that algorithm.
A subsequent lesson will
explain some of the signal processing concepts that made it possible for the
inventors of the FFT algorithm to design a computational algorithm that is much
faster than the DFT algorithm. As is often the case, however, the FFT
algorithm trades off speed for generality.
Copyright 2004, Richard G. Baldwin. Reproduction in whole or in part in any
form or medium without express written permission from Richard Baldwin is
About the author
Richard Baldwin is a
college professor (at Austin Community College in Austin, Texas) and private
consultant whose primary focus is a combination of Java, C#, and XML. In
addition to the many platform and/or language independent benefits of Java and
C# applications, he believes that a combination of Java, C#, and XML will become
the primary driving force in the delivery of structured information on the Web.
Richard has participated in numerous consulting projects, and he
frequently provides onsite training at the high-tech companies located in and
around Austin, Texas. He is the author of Baldwin’s Programming
Tutorials, which has gained a worldwide
following among experienced and aspiring programmers. He has also published
articles in JavaPro magazine.
Richard holds an MSEE degree from Southern Methodist University and has
many years of experience in the application of computer technology to real-world